<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sawyer Capital ManagementNew Angles On Size Premium &#8211; Sawyer Capital Management</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sawcap.com/2016/06/06/new-angles-on-size-premium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sawcap.com</link>
	<description>Evolutionize Web Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.22</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New Angles On Size Premium</title>
		<link>https://www.sawcap.com/2016/06/06/new-angles-on-size-premium/</link>
		<comments>https://www.sawcap.com/2016/06/06/new-angles-on-size-premium/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 09:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sawcap]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvemypractice.com/?p=2849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many investors and advisors who implement multifactor portfolios tend to focus on capturing the value premium over the size premium, often for the simple reason that, historically, the value premium has been larger. Others have even challenged the size premium’s very existence, citing a weak and varying historical record. In both situations, it may be...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sawcap.com/2016/06/06/new-angles-on-size-premium/">New Angles On Size Premium</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sawcap.com">Sawyer Capital Management</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many investors and advisors who implement multifactor portfolios tend to focus on capturing the value premium over the size premium, often for the simple reason that, historically, the value premium has been larger.</p>
<p>Others have even challenged the size premium’s very existence, citing a weak and varying historical record. In both situations, it may be that the size premium—and specifically the construction of the size factor—is not fully understood.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article on <a href="http://www.etf.com/sections/index-investor-corner/swedroe-new-angles-on-size-premium?nopaging=1" target="_blank">ETF.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sawcap.com/2016/06/06/new-angles-on-size-premium/">New Angles On Size Premium</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sawcap.com">Sawyer Capital Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.sawcap.com/2016/06/06/new-angles-on-size-premium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
